Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 3 has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than the Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. The Asus ROG Phone 3 construction is noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker than Moto G Fast. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a much more vibrant screen than Moto G Fast, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a little bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Asus ROG Phone 3 takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot better video resolution.
Asus ROG Phone 3 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.