Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition is way better than the Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 87.4 against 72.2. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has the older 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. Although Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition is better than the Moto G Fast, we must highlight that it's also a notably heavier and a bit thicker device.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has more RAM memory. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a little bigger display, more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better video definition and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a really longer battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.