Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Pearl white | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 8 is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a score of 79.5 against 72.2. Asus ROG Phone 8's design is a lot newer and a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G Fast's, although it's heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Asus ROG Phone 8 has a newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has an extremely better processor than Asus ROG Phone 8, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Asus ROG Phone 8 counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a higher number of pixels per display inch, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Asus ROG Phone 8 takes way better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Asus ROG Phone 8 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone 8 features a way better battery life than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.