Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a global score of 76.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's construction is lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a processor that is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Fast one, and although the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has 1 GB more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution. Moto G Fast takes clearer pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Fast also counts with a camera with a much better 16 megapixels resolution.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a much better memory for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with improved battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.