Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast, getting a global score of 77.4 against 72.2. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Fast has Android 11, so it offers a couple nice extra features. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) design is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Moto G Fast, even though it was released around a year before.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has more RAM. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with a much better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Motorola Moto G Fast has just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a larger back-facing camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.