Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has a general score of 81.1, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Google Nexus 6 has an older 5.1 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Google Nexus 6 is a way older and thicker phone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but Google was able to build it just a little lighter anyway.
The Google Nexus 6 features a much better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixels density and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Google Nexus 6 features a bit superior processor than Moto G Fast, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Fast features longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Moto G Fast takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Fast also has a higher resolution camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and video.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Nexus 6, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Fast, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.