Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is better than Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. The Google Pixel is an older device than the Moto G Fast, but Google made it just a bit thinner and way lighter. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores (but slower).
Google Pixel counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much higher screen density. The Moto G Fast takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G Fast also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a larger aperture.
The Google Pixel counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
The Google Pixel is way more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.