Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast, with a 76.7 score against 72.2. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) construction is noticeably thinner and lighter than Moto G Fast. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a newer 15 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11, so it gives you lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
The Moto G Fast has a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a way smaller screen. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
Moto G Fast features a really superior performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features just a little better battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.