Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with an 82.5 score against 72.2. The Google Pixel 2 XL design is thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit superior CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much more vibrant screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Google Pixel 2 XL has just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G Fast shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G Fast also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a much better resolution camera.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.