Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with a global score of 80 against 72.2. The Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it is way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 counts with a better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher display pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
Moto G Fast has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Fast shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments.
Moto G Fast features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.