Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. Although the Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Motorola Moto G Fast, it's design is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixels amount per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Motorola Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 16 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Moto G Fast has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Fast features just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3430mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Moto G Fast.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.