Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a overall score of 78.8 against 72.2. The Google Pixel 3a body is incredibly lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G Fast, although it was released only 13 months before. These devices use the same Android 11 operating system.
Google Pixel 3a's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Motorola Moto G Fast, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 3a has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixel count per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2220.
Moto G Fast counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Fast has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Fast also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Moto G Fast counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto G Fast.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.