Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Pearl white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 body is thinner and lighter than Moto G Fast, although both were only released 8 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2280px resolution and a much greater pixel number per inch of display. The Moto G Fast features a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G Fast also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4 costs a lot more than Moto G Fast, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.