Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Pearl white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is thinner but just a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Fast, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a way better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Fast features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Fast shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a lot higher 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Fast. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto G Fast, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.