Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Pearl white | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is better than Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Although Google Pixel 4a and the Moto G Fast were released with only 2 months difference, Google Pixel 4a is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way higher pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G Fast shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Fast features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 4a is way more expensive than Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.