Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a lot better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Moto G Fast were only released 5 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is lighter and thinner. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixel amount per inch of display and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G Fast counts with just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is way more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.