Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Pearl white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Moto G Fast, getting an 89 score against 72.2. Even though Google Pixel 5 and Moto G Fast were released only a couple months apart, Google Pixel 5 is extremely lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 5 features a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 5 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a way less mega-pixels back facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 5 features a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 2% bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 5 is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.