Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 6a is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with a global score of 76.4 against 72.2. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 6a has a more recent 12 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. The Google Pixel 6a construction is notably newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G Fast.
The Google Pixel 6a features a slightly better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Google Pixel 6a features a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Moto G Fast features a much faster processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The Google Pixel 6a counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4410mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Fast takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Although Google Pixel 6a is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Fast. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Fast, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.