Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11. The HTC One M9 is a way older and a little bit thicker phone than Motorola Moto G Fast, but HTC managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway.
The HTC One M9 has an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Moto G Fast features a much better storage to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G Fast also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also has a 64 bits CPU and an additional graphics processor. The HTC One M9 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the HTC One M9 also counts with a more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Moto G Fast features a much better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
HTC One M9 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto G Fast.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.