Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a score of 77.6 against 72.2. The HTC U11 design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The HTC U11 counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per display inch and a lot better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
HTC U11 has a little faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC U11 also has more RAM. HTC U11 counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with improved battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity. Moto G Fast counts with a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a same size aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Fast also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The HTC U11 costs more than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.