Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Huawei |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-01-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| $ 200.00 | $ 775.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro is a bit better than Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 78.7 against 72.2. Although the Huawei Mate 9 Pro is a lot older than the Moto G Fast, it's design is thinner and lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Huawei Mate 9 Pro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G Fast has Android 11.
Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot more pixels per screen inch. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Huawei Mate 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto G Fast has a little bit better camera than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Fast also has a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a way larger diafragm aperture and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro features a battery duration that's just as good as Moto G Fast's battery life.
Although Huawei Mate 9 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Huawei Mate 9 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Fast, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.