Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast, having a 77 score against 72.2. The LG G7 Fit construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast, even though it was released around a year before. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 Fit has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a way better display density. Motorola Moto G Fast has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although slower).
LG G7 Fit features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto G Fast counts with longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Fast shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a way larger aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.