Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-08-28 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 One has a global score of 76.8, which is a bit better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. The LG G7 One construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G Fast, although it was released just 22 months before. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the LG G7 One has older 10 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11.
The LG G7 One has a little better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G7 One also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 One has a much more vibrant display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and much more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG G7 One has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G7 One also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Fast features superior battery life than LG G7 One, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Moto G Fast captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG G7 One, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Moto G Fast also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.