Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is much better than Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 81 against 72.2. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. LG G7 ThinQ's design is thinner and lighter than the Moto G Fast, although it was released many years before.
The LG G7 ThinQ features an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher number of pixels per screen inch. LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The Moto G Fast has greater battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 33% larger battery size. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have a camera in the back with a 16 mega pixels and the same video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger camera aperture.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.