Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is better than Moto G Fast, with a general score of 84.3 against 72.2. Although the LG G8 ThinQ is older than the Moto G Fast, it's body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, providing some additional features.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much sharper display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way better screen pixel density. LG G8 ThinQ features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG G8 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG G8 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lower video definition and a camera in the back with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a little better battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG G8 ThinQ costs a bit more than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.