Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Pearl white | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is much better than Moto G Fast, getting an 82.5 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact that the LG G8S ThinQ is older than the Moto G Fast, it's design is just a little lighter and thinner. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG G8S ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Fast has Android 11.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a much better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a much better 1080 x 2248 pixels resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G8S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a little longer battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3550mAh.
The Moto G Fast counts with a slightly better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Fast also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much higher 16 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.