Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G Fast, and both of them were only released 7 months apart. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a better display than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a lot higher pixels number per display inch and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light environments and a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
LG G8X ThinQ has a battery performance that is very similar to the Moto G Fast one.
LG G8X ThinQ is a little more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.