Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K52 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast, having a score of 76 against 72.2. LG K52's construction is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Motorola Moto G Fast, even when both of them were only released 5 months apart. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but LG K52 has 10 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
LG K52 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K52 also has a greater amount of RAM. LG K52 counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a little higher 720 x 1600px resolution.
The LG K52 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Fast shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG K52, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera and a way smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Moto G Fast and the LG K52 both have extremely similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.