Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Q8 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 77.2 against 72.2. The LG Q8 is an noticeably older device than Motorola Moto G Fast, but LG managed to build it somewhat thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG Q8 has a newer 7.0 Nougat version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11, counting with some extra features.
LG Q8 features a much better display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a way better pixel number per inch of display. LG Q8 features much more memory to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage, the LG Q8 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a bit more powerful CPU than LG Q8, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The LG Q8 and Moto G Fast count with really similar cameras, because although the LG Q8 has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor.
The Moto G Fast has superior battery lifetime than LG Q8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.