Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with a 78.6 score against 72.2. The LG V10 is a notably older and just a little heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but LG was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. These phones include Android OS, but LG V10 has older 5.1 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11.
Moto G Fast has a little better hardware performance than LG V10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. LG V10 features a much more vibrant display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels density and a much better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
LG V10 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution back camera, the LG V10 also counts with higher video frame rates and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V10 has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G Fast features better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The LG V10 costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.