Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Moto G Fast, with a global score of 81.3 against 72.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is an much older cellphone than Moto G Fast, but LG made it thinner and lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a much better display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way higher display density.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ's camera is just as good as the camera in Moto G Fast, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a 16 MP back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G Fast features longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ is more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.