Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with a general score of 81.2 against 72.2. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. LG V40 ThinQ is an older device than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but LG was able to make it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a much higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a bigger camera sensor. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto G Fast counts with greater battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ costs a little more than Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.