Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is way better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a score of 87.6 against 72.2. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is somewhat heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and they were released only 3 months apart.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a better pixel quantity per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ features greater battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is way more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.