Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is way better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. The LG Velvet construction is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Moto G Fast, although they were released only a couple months apart. LG Velvet counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The LG Velvet counts with much more storage for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG Velvet takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a back camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG Velvet costs more money than Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.