Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is a lot better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Even being the best we are comparing here, LG Wing is a incredibly heavier and thicker cellphone than the Moto G Fast. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG Wing has older 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11.
LG Wing counts with a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because it has a better pixels density, a way better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite bigger display. LG Wing counts with a little faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG Wing has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because it has 224 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing's battery life is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto G Fast. LG Wing captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a camera with way more MP, better 60 fps video frame rate and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Fast, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.