Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Pearl white | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than Moto G Fast, having a score of 85.3 against 72.2. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a newer and notably thinner phone than Moto G Fast, although it's also notably heavier. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 operating system. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a little better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a lot better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a bigger screen, a way better 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Moto G Fast and the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 count with very similar cameras, and although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same camera aperture.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4449mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.