Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Pearl white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is incredibly newer and a little thinner, but just a little heavier than the Moto G Fast. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, giving some additional features and performance optimizations.
The Moto G Fast has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, more pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera, a much better video resolution and a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.