Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Pearl white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is better than Moto G Fast, with an 81.9 score against 72.2. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features and a performance increase. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a way newer device, and it's also a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Fast.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a much higher display pixel density. Moto G Fast counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.