Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is better than the Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto G Fast. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11.
Moto G Fast counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a higher count of pixels per screen inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher resolution back camera and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.