Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Pearl white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Moto G Fast, with an 87.1 score against 72.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is extremely newer and a little thinner than the Moto G Fast's, but it's just a little bit heavier. These phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite larger display and a better display pixels density. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Moto G Fast features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures, faster video frame rates, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.