Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Pearl white | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is better than Moto G Fast, having a general score of 82.6 against 72.2. Moto G 5G Plus's body is just a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the Moto G Fast, and both were released with only a couple months difference. Moto G 5G Plus features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot greater screen density and a way better 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G 5G Plus takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus has longer battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.