Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Pearl white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is better than the Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should give very similar OS features. The Motorola Moto G200 5G design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Moto G Fast's, although it is also a bit heavier.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 5 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a little larger screen, a higher display pixel density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2460.
Moto G200 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Moto G200 5G has just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G200 5G features longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.