Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 200.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. The Moto Z2 Force Edition construction is a lot lighter and extremely thinner than the Moto G Fast, even though it was released 3 years before. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher amount of pixels per display inch and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto G Fast shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Fast also has a bigger sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G Fast counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Moto Z2 Force Edition, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Fast, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.