Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play has a global score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Moto Z2 Play is an much older device than Moto G Fast, but Motorola managed to build it incredibly thinner and way lighter. Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G Fast features better battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. The Moto G Fast takes a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Moto G Fast also has a camera in the back with a lot better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play costs exactly the same than the Moto G Fast.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.