Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 has an overall score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z3 is older than Motorola Moto G Fast, it's design is lighter and much thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Moto Z3 features a better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2160px resolution and a greater pixels quantity per screen inch. Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G Fast counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G Fast has a slightly better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Fast also has a larger sensor, a back camera with way more megapixels and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Moto Z3 costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.