Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, having a 76.3 score against 72.2. Even though Motorola Moto Z3 Play is older than Motorola Moto G Fast, it's body is somewhat lighter and a lot thinner. The Moto Z3 Play has a sharper display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160.
Moto G Fast features a little bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Moto Z3 Play has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G Fast counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality images, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Although Moto Z3 Play is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Moto Z3 Play, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G Fast, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.