Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Pearl white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is slightly better than the Moto G Fast, having a score of 78.5 against 72.2. The Motorola One Action is a just a little bit lighter phone than the Moto G Fast, but both are equally thin. The Motorola One Action has a little faster CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One Action also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Action counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1080 x 2520 resolution. Moto G Fast has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G Fast also has a much higher resolution camera and a larger aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Moto G Fast counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Motorola One Action is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.