Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Pearl white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is better than Moto G Fast, having a 79.8 score against 72.2. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even though the Motorola One Hyper and the Moto G Fast were released only 6 months apart, the Motorola One Hyper construction is a bit heavier but also just a little bit thinner than the Moto G Fast.
Motorola One Hyper has a processing unit that's just as good as the Moto G Fast one, and although the Motorola One Hyper has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola One Hyper has a better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a quite larger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
The Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper and Moto G Fast feature really similar batteries performance.
The Motorola One Hyper costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.