Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Motorola One Vision is an older device than the Moto G Fast, but Motorola was able to make it just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Motorola One Vision features a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
Motorola One Vision has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has more internal memory. The Motorola One Vision features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Vision also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Fast features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a way more megapixels camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.