Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Pearl white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with a score of 80 against 72.2. Despite of the fact the Motorola One Zoom is older and a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G Fast, it's body is still a little thinner. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the processor in Moto G Fast, and although the Motorola One Zoom has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola One Zoom has a more vivid screen than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much higher pixels density. Motorola One Zoom has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola One Zoom's battery life is just as good as the Moto G Fast one.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Fast, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.